


"The general trend of medicine has been away from magic and empiricism and in the direction of rationality and definiteness."
—Abraham Flexner, "Medical Education: A Comparative Study," 1925
The Flexner Report’s legacy spans over a century, fundamentally transforming medical education into a rigorous science while inadvertently sparking modern crises in healthcare.
"The Flexner Report of 1910 transformed the nature and process of medical education in America with a resulting elimination of proprietary schools and the establishment of the biomedical model as the gold standard of medical training."
—Thomas P. Duffy, Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine: "The Flexner Report ― 100 Years Later," 2011.

The Biomedical Model: A post-Flexner Report framework that standardized U.S. medical training by prioritizing physiological diagnosis over holistic care, ResearchGate

This Nature Index data illustrates the fulfillment of Flexner’s vision: the U.S. evolution from substandard medical schools to a global leader in health sciences, Nature Index
"The demise of proprietary schools, the solidification of ties between medical schools and universities, and the introduction of the laboratory into the curriculum were outcomes that inaugurated the Flexnerian era in medical education. American and Canadian schools became the world's leaders."
—Ronald A. Arky, Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association, "Abe Flexner, Where Are You? We Need You!" 2007.

A graph of health science collaborations: This network of elite institutions stems from Flexner’s mandate to move medical training into modern research universities, Nature Index
Flexner’s benchmarks directly gave rise to today's monopolistic accreditation and nationalized licensing exams.
"The Flexner Report served as the foundation for standardized accreditation systems in medical education. It presented criteria for medical school accreditation, laying the groundwork for subsequent medical school accreditation evaluations."
—Hyun Bae Yoon, Sun Jung Myung, JKMS: "The Impact and Implications of the Flexner Report on Medical Education in Korea" 2024.

LCME, the only nationally recognized accrediting authority for medical education programs leading to the M.D. degree in the U.S. and Canada, LCME
The 1916 NBME Parts exam institutionalized Flexner’s mandate for licensure, later evolving into the 1968 FLEX and 1992 USMLE.
"The United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE®) is created by the FSMB and NBME,
replacing the FLEX and NBME Parts exams for initial medical licensure.
The USMLE provides an assessment for initial medical licensure and is
open to students and graduates of accredited medical education programs and to international students/graduates eligible for ECFMG certification."
—Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB): "History Timeline," 2024.

The 1968 FLEX exam, The Armchair Historian


The USMLE, 1992, Professional Licensing Report

A diagram of the modern medical credentialing process, BellMedEx
"Flexner’s findings became the predicate for a medical school and residency credentialing system that controls physicians’ entry into medical practice. ... Further, graduation from an accredited school makes candidates eligible to take the standardized US Medical Licensing Exam, which is also a necessary step for licensure."
—Regulatory Transplant Project, "Promoting a More Adaptable Physician Pipeline," 2012.
LCME standards ensured educational quality, while the USMLE serves as a mandatory, independent standardized examination for licensure.
With these new reforms, though, patient narratives were overshadowed by standardized textbooks and data.

Painting representing doctors that cared more about the individual patient than the impersonal scientific data evidence, ResearchGate
"Flexner’s corpus was all nerves without the lifeblood of caring. [Fellow doctor William] Osler’s warning that the ideals of medicine would change as 'teacher and student chased each other down the fascinating road of research, forgetful of those wider interests to which a hospital must minister' has proven prescient and wise."
—Thomas P. Duffy, Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine: "The Flexner Report ― 100 Years Later," 2011.
"American medicine profited immeasurably from the scientific advances... but the hyper-rational system of German science created an imbalance in the art and science of medicine. ...As it was, the science of medicine eclipsed the active witnessing of our patients."
—Thomas P. Duffy, Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine: "The Flexner Report ― 100 Years Later," 2011.
"Curiosity is probably what [still] links the researchers and the clinicians, even to this day. Because when we're taking care of patients, I'm asking myself, 'Why is this happening to this patient? What can explain this?' ... In that sense, even the bedside clinician is doing research."
— Professor Bradley Denker, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Interview with Lucas Zhang, April 2, 2026
"[C]onventionally, we rely a lot on the universal, standardized baseline. However, when it comes to the human brain, we
recently realized that the functional organization varies substantially across individuals."
— Professor Hesheng Liu, Division of Brain Sciences Chief Scientist, Peking University and Harvard Medical School, Interview with Lucas Zhang, March 29, 2026
However, modern, digital medicine offers restoration.
“I see digital medicine not as reducing patients to data, but actually expanding what counts as meaningful data... We are not replacing the human story; we actually capture parts of data that we were unable to measure before.”
— Professor Honghuang Lin, Division of Health Systems Science and the Program in Digital Medicine, UMass T. H. Chan Medical School, Interview with Lucas Zhang, March 29, 2026
"The electronic medical record helps with that, because you can track and see what [your patients] are doing... [In] my specialty, which is the kidney, [electronic medical records] integrate the multiple aspects of the whole organ systems. "
— Professor Bradley Denker, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Interview with Lucas Zhang, April 2, 2026
This scientific emphasis fractured holistic care, driving an unprecedented rise in specialization.
"While the pre-clinical curricula in medical schools now incorporate ‘the new sciences’, the format of educational programs has changed little, integration of the biological and social sciences so integral to medicine is so rarely attempted, and the silo approach that has each pre-clinical department doing ‘their thing’ remains dominant."
—Ronald A. Arky, Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association, "Abe Flexner, Where Are You? We Need You!" 2007.
"Some of [the fragmentation] is related to the way doctors are paid...
specialists were paid more, so therefore incentivized more to go into those specialties. To complicate that fact, medical education is [obviously] very expensive."
— Professor Bradley Denker, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Interview with Lucas Zhang, April 2, 2026
Today, a "counter-report" movement actively works to de-Flexnerize curricula and prioritize health equity.

A student prepares for the USMLE, a modern crisis of information overload, Residency Advisor
"Medicine and the sciences underpinning it have made equally transformative advances since Flexner’s report, and once again, our approach to education is inadequate to meet the needs of medicine."
—Molly Cooke, David M. Irby, et al., New England Journal of Medicine: "American Medical Education 100 Years after the Flexner Report" 2006.
"In 2010, the Carnegie Foundation will issue another report, Educating Physicians: A Call for Reform of Medical School and Residency, that calls for (1) standardizing learning outcomes and individualizing the learning process, (2) promoting multiple forms of integration, (3) incorporating habits of inquiry and improvement, and (4) focusing on the progressive formation of the physician’s professional identity."
—David M. Irby et al., Academic Medicine: "Calls for Reform of Medical Education," 2010.
Professor Liu on Reforming and Updating the Conventional Standardized Baseline for Neurological Disease and Psychiatric Disorders.
Source: Professor Hesheng Liu, Division of Brain Sciences Chief Scientist, Peking University and Harvard Medical School, Interview with Lucas Zhang, March 29, 2026
"Medical education can still
emphasize curiosity, investigation, and understanding the way things work, and at the same time teach or encourage the
humanistic side of medicine—of taking care of the
whole person, making sure they have adequate resources to have their needs met, and to integrate that holistic part with the basic science part."
— Professor Bradley Denker, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Interview with Lucas Zhang, April 2, 2026
The "Social Mission" Movement finds the research productivity reflected in the Flexner Report inadequate. It evaluates medical schools on their ability to produce primary care physicians who serve underserved communities.

Medical school rankings by "Social Mission Score". This metric challenges Flexnerian research prestige by prioritizing primary care and workforce diversity in underrepresented communities, Annals of Internal Medicine
"School rankings based on the social mission score differ from those that use research funding... These findings suggest that initiatives at the medical school level could increase the proportion of physicians who practice primary care, work in underserved areas, and are underrepresented minorities."
—Mullan, F., Chen, C., Petterson, S., et al., "The social mission of medical education: ranking the schools." Annals of Internal Medicine, 2010.
Professor Denker describing efforts by kidney doctors to provide primary care to underserved areas.
Source: Professor Bradley Denker, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Interview with Lucas Zhang, April 2, 2026
Modern medicine continuously reforms itself, reacting to Flexner’s scientific revolution by working to restore the humanistic care his initial model stripped away.